By my count, that then brings us to Sunday, and almost back up to date with our travels!
Sunday was Louvre day, and it is really impossible to capture, in pictures, how big the Louvre is. I have tried below, but none of these capture anything even close to the whole building - for that, you'd need to see it from the air. \240It is, by most counts, the largest museum of any kind in the world (the Met in New York and the Hermitage in Russia also come close, but having been to the Met, I can safely say that the Louvre feels a lot bigger).
If you are sick of art on the blog, I have good news - as I had slightly expected, the Louvre is not really about the art. \240Instead, it feels more like a social institution - a place to see, but mainly to be seen - a bit like Fashion Week, the Oscars, the Cannes Film Festival or the Met Gala, but open to all and sundry (or at least those that can afford a ticket). \240You can probably imagine what I mean - a roiling cauldron of the best and worst of humanity, featuring haggard CEO-dads brawling over whose turn it is to photograph Venus de Milo next; struggling influencers from Idaho in strappy tops who try to drape themselves near The Winged Victory, in the hope that a well-snapped selfie will land a lucrative modelling gig; wealthy Mediterranean-looking blokes with their sunglasses on indoors; muscled lads in singlets who clearly just came to Paris for the boxing but decided to spend their off-day at the Louvre; struggling hipster parents with high-priced double strollers who are clearly trying to immerse their twins, Schenectady and Maddox, 2, in the art world from an early age; demanding American women literally yelling at the museum guards “Mona Lisa where?”
At times, the space itself encourages this by threatening to dwarf the art - in parts, it is more "airport terminal" than "museum".
Here is Meg looking very fashionable in front of the famous glass pyramid designed by IM Pei, who also designed Collins Place - the entry is through the pyramid, and then underground to a wide open plaza that connects the three main wings of the building.
Here are Da Vinci's other masterpieces - “The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne”; "Portrait of a Woman of the Court of Milan"; and "Madonna of the Rocks".
I did eventually get to the front of the queue, and got "the" picture. \240It is good. Very good. No question about that. Not Da Vinci's best (some of his better works are in the corridor outside). \240It is also dirty and a bit washed-out-looking. \240The Louvre says they can't restore it because the oils have cracked and the dirt is in the cracks and it's too risky to do it, and nobody quite knows exactly what colours Da Vinci originally intended because his paints weren't very good. All of that is undoubtedly true, but I suspect they also just don't want to take it out of the museum for a few years because it is such a money-spinner.
There is also at least one Caravaggio (a big deal as I don't think I've ever seen one before - I am pretty sure none of his paintings hang in Australia).
My favourite painting was "Liberty Leading the People", by Eugene Delacroix - it practically glows.
Upstairs in a slightly quieter part, we also found "The Lacemaker" by Vermeer.
Ths sculpture collection is second-to-none, including the aforementioned Winged Victory (Meg's favourite).
We also wandered upstairs to see Napoleon's apartments, which have been preserved in their original state - holy smokes.
And the Venus de Milo. \240My favourite - it is genuinely beautiful (or, as Meg's uncle would say, "But it's broken!")
After the Louvre closed for the day, we had tickets across town to see the Catacombs of Paris. \240This had literally been on my bucket list, and I was surprised how easy it was to do.
After presenting our tickets, we walked down a spiral staircase (more stairs!!) until we were 20m below surface level (and more than 10m below the sewerage systems, the Metro train lines, etc). \240The story behind the catacombs is incredible - for centuries, Paris has been undermined by a network of deep quarries stretching for miles underground, which were used to dig out the pale yellow limestone known as "Paris stone" which is used for most of the buildings around town. \240Of course, this began to create problems when buildings became larger and the quarries started to collapse - this is partly why there are no true skyscrapers in Paris today (the foundations can't go deep enough without running into the voids).
The city authorities have, for hundreds of years, operated a program of identifying and stabilising all the underground tunnels - you can see one of the tunnels below, along with a stone showing the name of the street above.
Once we came up for air, we enjoyed an aperol spritz and pasta al fresco (as you do). \240We then wandered back over to the Louvre to see the Tuileries Jardins, which is where the Olympic cauldron is located. \240Stopped for a creme brulee at a lovely little bar on Rue Saint Honore on the way back to our hotel. \240Another wonderful day was had by all.
There is a strict "no touching the bones" policy - they are, after all, human remains, and in the early days of tours through the Catacombs, a number of them were damaged.
The bones were neatly stacked, including some which were formed into crosses, hearts - even the shape of the Eiffel Tower!
It was very cold and damp underground (t-shirt and shorts didn't really cut it), but otherwise felt a bit more like a library than anything else - everything (everyone?) filed neatly away in their niche. They have even had classical music concerts down here (although it wouldn't be my choice of venue!)
This marker shows that this niche was filled with bones moved between 1848 and 1859.
You might not want to read this next bit if you've just eaten. In the 1600s, Paris had a severe problem with overcrowding in its cemeteries, which were located in the central parts of the city. \240The city sought to manage this by "recycling" graves - effectively, after a period of time, the bones were exhumed and stacked up in buildings ("charnel houses" or "ossuaries"), purpose-built for the storage of the bones. \240This became untenable over time as the overcrowding became worse, and the city tried to turn over graves more quickly (ie, before decomposition was complete) - and the matter came to a head when the wall of a charnel house in the city gave way under the weight of the bones stacked against it, causing human remains to spill into neighbouring properties. \240Advances in medical science had also called into question the hygiene of such practices in the first place.
A solution needed to be found, and over the next several decades, until the mid-1800s, the remains of over 6 million Parisians were exhumed and moved to the underground voids left by the quarries. The remains were not individually marked or labelled, except with markers to indicate which cemetery they came from and when they were moved to the catacombs. \240Many notable figures from French history ended up here, but there is no way of knowing where they are.
It is indeed quite the spectacle, and I’m absolutely glad we did it (it is definitely a bucket-list thing), but it is not really a place to sit and quietly contemplate the art, unless the art that you wish to contemplate is a cracked 18th century teacup in the objets d’art section that everybody else has ignored. \240If you want to quietly contemplate anything by a French or Italian painter, forget it. \240Is no possible. \240Snap your selfie and move on 😂
We might as well start with Mona Lisa and get it out of the way. By the time you get to this point in the queue, you are doing pretty well - four or five heads in your picture means you're basically at the front of the queue. 20 heads in your picture? You’re gonna be waiting a while.